Recommended list point

$—

Lowcost floor Moderateimproved comps Highverified set
Subject parcel · satelliteinteractive → static fallback
Satellite — subject parcel with boundary

Value range & condition band

Valuationkey · value
What drives the number
02Subject property

A genuine rural homestead.

Street viewrural → static fallback
Street View — subject parcel
Parcel boundaryLeaflet · OpenStreetMap
Subject parcel boundary
Record · parcel 88-35-22-000-010.000-005
03Improvements

What sits on the land.

County cost record (assessor external-only, 05/11/2023): replacement cost new, depreciation, and contributory assessed value per structure.

ImprovementDetailBuiltSizeGradeDeprRCNAssessed

04Land / site comps

What bare acreage trades for.

Bare-land & small-tract sales, time-adjusted −6%/yr to the as-of date — the red chip is the time mark-down (land is softening). Each row links to Zillow and its county parcel record.

Adjusted $/acre · subject reference line

adopted $9,200/ac dashed
Land comps
05Improved (house-on-acreage) comps

The primary evidence.

Homes on acreage, time-adjusted +4%/yr (green chip = appreciation). This set carries the most weight — subject pinned at top, county-confirmed close matches badged.

Primary

Adjusted sale vs acreage

subject ★ in blue
subject county-confirmed match improved comp
Improved comps

06Time adjustment

Every sale, restated to today.

Each comp is brought to the as-of date: land softening (Purdue, red ▼) and residential appreciation (FHFA / IAR, green ▲), applied per comp.

land · direction down

improved · direction up

formula

Per-comp time adjustment

gain ▲ green · loss ▼ red
land marked down (−6%/yr) improved marked up (+4%/yr)
07Active listings

Today's order book.

Current competing supply — homes-on-acreage and bare land. Figure shows the ask; the chip shows days-on-market.

Active listings

08County GIS cross-verification

Every record, checked twice.

All 30 comps + listings resolved to their county parcel record; Zillow acreage cross-checked vs county acreage. Status flags divergence severity.

CompCountyParcelZillow acCounty acΔStatus

realtor.com (MLS) cross-verification

A third, MLS-fed read.

An independent third source — realtor.com's MLS-fed sold records (RDC Frontdoor GraphQL, read-only) — checked against the Zillow + county-GIS figure for each comp realtor.com carries. The same realtor.com listings supply the photo thumbnails throughout this report.

CompRecorded $ (Zillow/county)realtor.com $realtor.com date3-way verdictSource

Source

09Regional map

The neighborhood, at a glance.

Subject, sold comps, active listings, and the 1 / 3 / 5-mile rings. Tap any marker for sale data and dual records links.

Regional comps · interactiveLeaflet · OpenStreetMap
Regional comps map
Subject Sold comp Active listing 1 · 3 · 5-mi rings

Proximity: comps + listings by ring

subject at center
10Reconciliation

Three reads, one number.

Three methods triangulated: the improved-comp read (primary), depreciated cost (floor), and the excluded 2020 bulk transfer.

MethodTagComputationIndicated valueWeight

Where the number lands

method ranges · recommended marker
recommended $174,900 defensible $149k–$200k improved-comp read cost floor

★ vs neighbor ·004
Worth ≈ 2× the ·004 vacant neighbor

11Methodology & caveats

The work behind the opinion.

The analysis pipeline, the limits of a desktop CMA, and full source provenance.

    Sources